The People of the State of New York are the plaintiff’s in this matter against the defendants. This case is being heard in the Westchester County Court. A New York Sex Crimes Lawyer said one of the defendants has moved for an order to dismiss the instant indictment against him…
This is a case being heard in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County. The case involves the People of the State of New York versus the defendant. Case Background On the second of June in 2005 at around 3:20 in the afternoon, the…
The People of the State of New York are the respondents in this case of appeal. The appellant is James Lavender, who is appealing a verdict that was made by a jury in the Supreme Court of Bronx County on the 19th of March, 1984. This verdict convicted the defendant…
This is a case involving the People of the State of New York against the defendant George P. Tobler. The case is being heard in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Criminal Term in Suffolk County, Part I. The defendant of the case has moved to compel…
Bronx County Rape 7 Alberto Ramos is the appellant and respondent of this particular case. The respondent and appellant of the matter is the City of New York. Case Background The plaintiff, Alberto Ramos was a college student in 1984 and was studying to be a teacher. He was employed…
This is a case for appeal being heard in the Third Department, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the State of New York. Mark S. is the appellant of the case and the State of New York is the respondent. Mark S. is appealing two orders that were made…
This case is taking place in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. The appellant in the matter is the People of the State of New York. The respondent in the case is Frederick Wilkinson. A New York Sex Crimes Lawyer said the defendant is…
The complainant trader who committed an error was indicted and convicted, under the Revised Statutes of the State, for the criminal act of selling liquor without a license. The indictment contained several specifications but they were all similar. The jurors, for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, upon their oath present, that…
Respondents committed criminal acts of burning a cross and properties during a gathering. They were convicted of violating Virginia’s cross-burning statute, Sec. 18.2-423. The statute provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person or persons, with the intent of intimidating any person or group of persons, to burn, or cause…
The right to a speedy trial is a right that is essential to the Constitution of the United States of America. Each person is granted the right to a speedy trial before a jury of their peers. However, the Constitution does not define the term speedy. Lawyers and legislatures have…