The county police found evidence involving a man in a number of burglaries. As a result, the said man was indicted for the crime of burglary in the third degree and two counts of grand larceny in the third degree. The man also faced a charge of petit larceny. After…
New York Criminal Lawyer Blog
CPL 440.30 (4)
A Suffolk Criminal Lawyer said that, by motion submitted October 19, 2011, defendant moves to vacate his judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h). On May 15, 1975, judgment was entered against the defendant in Supreme Court, Bronx County, convicting him upon his plea of guilty to robbery…
CPL 440.10 (1)
A Queens Criminal Lawyer said that this is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 11, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminally using drug crime paraphernalia in the second degree, upon…
The court further agrees with the Family Court
A Queens Criminal Lawyer said that, in a proceeding pursuant to the Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from (1) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County, dated December 15, 1987, which, upon a fact-finding order dated November 18, 1987, made upon the appellant’s admission,…
Penal Law § 220.25
A Suffolk Marijuana Possession Lawyer said that, this is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 25, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree,…
People v Kanhai
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and…
State and Federal Constitutions
A Suffolk Criminal Lawyer said that, on April 24, 1972, the Suffolk County police, executing a search warrant at the premises of defendant, found evidence implicating him in a number of burglaries. As a result, defendant was indicted for the crime of burglary in the third degree and for two…
The Supreme Court denied the motion for a mistrial
In addition, the criminal defendant challenged the voluntariness of his statements to the police by testifying during the trial that they were the product of verbal threats and physical abuse by the police. The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal…
Reilly v. Hults
Reilly v. Hults Court Discuses the Revocation of Driver’s License after Refusing to Submit to a Chemical Test The Motor Vehicle Commissioner appealed the annulment of the revocation of the defendant’s license by the Commissioner after he refused to submit to a chemical blood test to determine the alcohol content…
Grievance Committee’s motion
A Suffolk Criminal Lawyer said that, by letter dated August 3, 2007, the respondent informed the Court of his conviction of serious offenses automatically resulting in the revocation of his license to practice law in New York State. Effective July 27, 2007, he ceased the practice of law. The Grievance…