Close

New York Criminal Lawyer Blog

Updated:

VTL § 1194(2)(f)

A defendant is arrested for driving while intoxicated. He is not given Miranda warnings. He is given inadequate “refusal” warnings in connection with a request by the police that defendant consent to submit to a chemical “breathalyzer test” for the presence of alcohol in his system. Defendant answers (while videotaped)…

Updated:

Grand Jury which returned said indictment was unconstitutionally selected

In this Criminal action, defendants filed a motion for ‘an order directing the dismissal of the indictment herein upon the ground that the Grand Jury which returned said indictment was unconstitutionally selected and therefore did not acquire jurisdiction to charge the defendants. Before dealing with the merits it is necessary…

Updated:

CPL 210.05

A Kings Domestic Violence Lawyer said that, the defendant was charged with, inter alia, harassment in the second degree based on numerous harassing and threatening telephone calls he allegedly made to his former paramour, with whom he had two children. On January 18, 2007, a misdemeanor complaint was filed charging…

Updated:

The charges arose out of an incident which took place on May 23, 1992

The defendant was convicted after a jury trial of Kidnapping in the First Degree, Rape in the First Degree (five counts), Sodomy in the First Degree (four counts), Robbery in the Third Degree, and Assault in the Second Degree. He was sentenced to an aggregate indeterminate term of incarceration amounting…

Updated:

The court agrees…. con’t

In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. Defendant’s contention fails because of the lack of evidence that DM’s suspicion predated his decision to accuse defendant and to cooperate with the D.A.’s office.…

Contact Us